Maniaplanet Forum

Three useful links:

• Last dedicated server file: viewtopic.php?p=241688#p241688
• Information about how setting up a server: http://doc.maniaplanet.com/dedicated-server/
• How promoting a server as ladder server: http://wiki.maniaplanet.com/en/Dedicate ... _server.3F

We had not the the time to setup the rules for Royal Ladder

Just a little update to say we intend to do it and that the current situation, borrowed from a player and comparing to TM was suggested as so

Amateurs place
-0-60000 ladder points
-10000 planets deposit
-Public
-rule test: no players limit

Serious challengers
-0-70000 ladder points
-20000 planets deposit
-Public
-32 players max
-No lol map

Competitive players
-0-80000 ladder points
-40000 planets deposit
-Public
-24 players max
-No lol map

Pro arena
-0-90000
-80000 planets deposit
-Public
-20 players max
-points limit is linked to the following formula: number players on the server * 10 = points limit
It means that the points limit is 200 when the players number is 20 on the server: 20 players*10 = 200 points limit
-No lol map

Champions Arena
-0-100000 ladder points
-80000 planets deposit
-Public
-as test: players limit can be increased until 20 instead of 12.
-rule test: points limit is linked to the following formula: (number players on the server * 10) + 30 = points limit
For 12 players, the limits point is (12*10) + 30 = 150 points.
-No Pole capture time higher for the moment (but can be tested on servers)
-No lol map and maps approved by nadeo (as test: 30 tracks maximum)

put in your wishlist this topic if that's in top priotity of your wishes. Moderation of top ladder servers shall be setup.

Hylis wrote: Competitive racers
0-80000 ladder points
40000 planets deposit
Public
24 players max

Perhaps Competitive racers should be changed into Competitive Arena, after all its not a racing game

Greetz,

*

Thanks guys for your report
Actually it's competitive players the right words

Hiya!

so we run a 90K Royal server and pointlimit of 200 would be ok if enough players are around.
We top at the max of 20 players, but we also have a around 5 players a lot of times.
Pointlimit of 200 is ridiculous then. A dynamic pointlimit makes more sense.
Please advice in this regards or we will change our 90K to 80K. Meaning we will loose a lot of players.
I'd rather have a rule saying 90K server has a dynamic pointlimit but should only allow players 50K or higher.

Thanks,
Charly

Having a dynamic points limit makes sense. For example, we can set the following rule: number players on the server * 10 = points limit.

Alinoa wrote:Having a dynamic points limit makes sense. For example, we can set the following rule: number players on the server * 10 = points limit.

To all serverowners: wait with changing your pointlimits until after the official rules have been changed.

That would really help!

I'll wait until it is changed in the first post, ok?
Thanks for understanding!

Cheers,
Charly

Alinoa wrote:Having a dynamic points limit makes sense. For example, we can set the following rule: number players on the server * 10 = points limit.

Well, maybe you can remove the maxplayerlimit for 60k Servers?

I have just edited the rules for the 90k servers. So now the points limit is linked to the players number on the server.

kripkee wrote:Well, maybe you can remove the maxplayerlimit for 60k Servers?

We can look at changing rules if you explain why you think that it's fine to change the rule