If continious crying about rox and nucs is settled as a legal, acknowlegded reason for banning, yes
Otherwise no
With regards,
Weerwolf
bans on 100k servers
Moderators: w1lla, TheM, le-professionel, sbone, laurens92, NADEO
Re: bans on 100k servers
Let them cry, their tears will feed your aim Although, If it's used for insulting a player, like continuosly calling people "rocket att noob" or "nuc noob" then it should be punishable by kick and later ban.weerwolf wrote:If continious crying about rox and nucs is settled as a legal, acknowlegded reason for banning, yes
Otherwise no
With regards,
Weerwolf
- w1lla
- Posts: 2396
- Joined: 15 Jun 2010, 11:09
- Manialink: maniaplanetblog
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: bans on 100k servers
Play the game by the rules, not by someone's words of rage/anger or disappointment. The game was made the way it was supposed to be made. Otherwise make your own title and play there with your own rules.plopp wrote:Let them cry, their tears will feed your aim Although, If it's used for insulting a player, like continuosly calling people "rocket att noob" or "nuc noob" then it should be punishable by kick and later ban.weerwolf wrote:If continious crying about rox and nucs is settled as a legal, acknowlegded reason for banning, yes
Otherwise no
With regards,
Weerwolf
TM² Info
SM Info
QM Info
OS: Windows 10 x64 Professional
MB: MSI 970A-G46
Processor: AMD FX-6300 3500 mHz
RAM Memory: 16 GB DDR3
Video: SAPPHIRE DUAL-X R9 280X 3GB GDDR5
KB: Logitech G510s
Mouse: Logitech G300s
Mode Creation
ManiaScript Docs
SM Info
QM Info
OS: Windows 10 x64 Professional
MB: MSI 970A-G46
Processor: AMD FX-6300 3500 mHz
RAM Memory: 16 GB DDR3
Video: SAPPHIRE DUAL-X R9 280X 3GB GDDR5
KB: Logitech G510s
Mouse: Logitech G300s
Mode Creation
ManiaScript Docs
Re: bans on 100k servers
what is this all about?
It had nothing to do with the ROC rotation announcement topic.
Therefore splitted.
Please explain, or agree that this thread can be deleted
It had nothing to do with the ROC rotation announcement topic.
Therefore splitted.
Please explain, or agree that this thread can be deleted
Re: bans on 100k servers
http://forum.maniaplanet.com/viewtopic. ... =0#p218194
Please READ? before moving and/or deleting?
It has EVERYTHING to do about the Storm 100K servers
Please READ? before moving and/or deleting?
It has EVERYTHING to do about the Storm 100K servers
Alinoa wrote:In July will start a new session of 100K Storm (Battle and Siege) servers. For having a 100k server, your server has to be validated by nadeo. Thank you for contacting me if you want to run a 100K Storm (Battle and Siege) server for three months from July.
Information about 100K Storm (Battle and Siege) server available here
damn this is the second time i hit the ceiling this week in this game ...weerwolf wrote:If continious crying about rox and nucs is settled as a legal, acknowlegded reason for banning, yes
Otherwise no
With regards,
Weerwolf
Re: bans on 100k servers
Well, whatever..
If you have some players who cry about this, you should "ignore" these guys, maybe forever. They can play there and should learn to live with this. To kick players cause of "rage" in conbination with badwords is ok - a ban if they don't have the time to learn it.^^
I think your servers running fine and I think you can calculate these situations. If you want to ban a player, who won't never stop with this, you will have the right to ban them. Btw. Your server is your "home" and you can decide who can play on it, and who not - with the nadeo-ladderrules for sure. If some players start to "cry" and they can't stop, you should ignore them. If they do more bullshit, then you can kick or ban him/her.
On the other hand, if you ban players without any reason and these guys complain here and you can't prove "your" (clanmember/other admins/ops) action, then you could get a warning from Nadeo/Laddermod and so on.
- and yes, I talk about a 100k server -
I don't know, If I could help you^^
If you have some players who cry about this, you should "ignore" these guys, maybe forever. They can play there and should learn to live with this. To kick players cause of "rage" in conbination with badwords is ok - a ban if they don't have the time to learn it.^^
I think your servers running fine and I think you can calculate these situations. If you want to ban a player, who won't never stop with this, you will have the right to ban them. Btw. Your server is your "home" and you can decide who can play on it, and who not - with the nadeo-ladderrules for sure. If some players start to "cry" and they can't stop, you should ignore them. If they do more bullshit, then you can kick or ban him/her.
On the other hand, if you ban players without any reason and these guys complain here and you can't prove "your" (clanmember/other admins/ops) action, then you could get a warning from Nadeo/Laddermod and so on.
- and yes, I talk about a 100k server -
I don't know, If I could help you^^
Last edited by kripkee on 13 Jun 2014, 12:08, edited 1 time in total.
Re: bans on 100k servers
Your post was neither a qualified reply to Alinoa's announcement nor any other form of useful message,weerwolf wrote:It has EVERYTHING to do about the Storm 100K servers
it was rather a rant that has no place in a simple and pure announcement topic.
You can be happy that I did not simply delete it and asked for clarification.
Re: bans on 100k servers
ok, lets pretend im new here, not 7 years, being contructive all the time, helping out, providing servers etc etc etc and that i have to explain something to a child (dunno other way to express it)
I have a ladder server Siege (2nd period), i do know the rules, and im responding to the question of the 3rd period, where i inform that i want to do it, if the rules are adjusted to the new facts, or if not possible to decline to run a 100K siege server (for the 3rd period).
Soooo there it is. I see all the time u spend here to do forum stuff, etc, and do respect that greatly. But this clearly is a mistake and i hope ur not to pride to ackknowledge that. For that way i think in ur vision about that thread u could just have pm d me - im here 5 times a day.
Kind Regards,
Weerwolf
A qualified reply is where a post is an statement, reaction or carriers any information in a response to a former post (which is on subject) or to the subject.Your post was neither a qualified reply
I have a ladder server Siege (2nd period), i do know the rules, and im responding to the question of the 3rd period, where i inform that i want to do it, if the rules are adjusted to the new facts, or if not possible to decline to run a 100K siege server (for the 3rd period).
An announcement is where - this is, or they are, or we will ; Alinoa asks for players who want to run a server, ask -> response.Alinoa's announcement
I cannot remember ever seen a rant post here on this forum, or others, where someone closes with kind regards. I would expect some active people and moderator to know me well, or a bit here on the forom, because im a pretty active guy. I think the only rant i ever made was in the old forum in a private message to Hylis <3, not public; but serious this is not even close to a rant, you gotta admit that.it was rather a rant
Announcement topics are used to be closed; annouce>lock etc.pure announcement topic.
i sometimes need this attitude towards my servers guest to, and usually goes first with a pm - that could have been done here to.You can be happy that I did not simply delete it and asked for clarification
Soooo there it is. I see all the time u spend here to do forum stuff, etc, and do respect that greatly. But this clearly is a mistake and i hope ur not to pride to ackknowledge that. For that way i think in ur vision about that thread u could just have pm d me - im here 5 times a day.
Kind Regards,
Weerwolf
Re: bans on 100k servers
Hey guys, you are both right
For sure Weerwolf was not off-topic and splitting the thread for continuing the discussion was not a bad decision neither to let the announcement topic clear.
I think that Kripke quite well resumed when you can kick someone or ban someone and crying about rox and nucs is not a sufficient reason for permanently banning a player.
For sure Weerwolf was not off-topic and splitting the thread for continuing the discussion was not a bad decision neither to let the announcement topic clear.
I think that Kripke quite well resumed when you can kick someone or ban someone and crying about rox and nucs is not a sufficient reason for permanently banning a player.
Ubisoft Support
Your Player Page
More information about maniaplanet, support, contents, community activities: useful links
ManiaPlanet technical documentation portal (Dedicated server, Mediatracker, ManiaLink, ManiaScript, Titles...)
Your Player Page
More information about maniaplanet, support, contents, community activities: useful links
ManiaPlanet technical documentation portal (Dedicated server, Mediatracker, ManiaLink, ManiaScript, Titles...)
Re: bans on 100k servers
weerwolf, seriously, you made a elefant out of a ant.
It was not at all my intention to attack or to offend you, therefore I did not see the need for a PM here,
as I thought that a clarifying answer would interest others as well.
Now I'm surprised that you're kind of attacking me personally, at least it feels like this, but I'm not upset.
It's only a pity you are that apparently this much frustrated.
Shall I (or if you prefer: another moderator) cleanup this thread?
It was not at all my intention to attack or to offend you, therefore I did not see the need for a PM here,
as I thought that a clarifying answer would interest others as well.
Now I'm surprised that you're kind of attacking me personally, at least it feels like this, but I'm not upset.
It's only a pity you are that apparently this much frustrated.
Now I understoodAlinoa wrote:I think that Kripke quite well resumed when you can kick someone or ban someone and crying about rox and nucs is not a sufficient reason for permanently banning a player.
Shall I (or if you prefer: another moderator) cleanup this thread?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests