Page 2 of 7

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 19 Jan 2013, 11:57
by Omnixor
Timmeh7 wrote:Eurogamer reported that the new Stadium will be free-to-play. ;) But I'm not sure if there was an official confirmation.
there was an official denial ^^ nadeo said they're not sure about how they'll provide stadium, free or not.

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 19 Jan 2013, 12:57
by hackie
Free to play ? like that stupid freezone on TM1 ?

No thanks , it killed TMF.

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 19 Jan 2013, 13:08
by v6sarally
hackie wrote:Free to play ? like that stupid freezone on TM1 ?

No thanks , it killed TMF.
Indeed, only not that please! :shock:

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 19 Jan 2013, 13:10
by TGYoshi
Thing is, they have to earn money somehow. In TMN they simply sold TMUF, and now they simply sell Canyon.
Freezone is there to increase income for Nadeo since their advertisement provider cut the line, removing all profits from TMNF. (stimulating buy of TMUF)

Keep in mind this all was made to earn money, not to just provide fun.

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 19 Jan 2013, 16:35
by Filipe1020
I still think that if they will make Stadium not free and having the same price of Canyon is kinda dumb, I mean as I can tell it's the same TMNF but with better graphics and Maniaplanet features, and not a sequel of TMNF with a brand new stadium and anything, making it F2P might inspire people to buy Canyon and Valley because they will find out how good Maniaplanet can be and everything, speaking of the prices of the games, it should be atleast 8 or 10 dollars, most of my friends refused to buy Canyon because it's only 1 envi and it costs $20

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 19 Jan 2013, 17:32
by TMarc
Nadeo decided to make every new environment (or title as they now prefere to name it) available for 20€.
I think it is a average cost. Some environments might be more worth because they made much more work,
and some might be less worth because it is merely a re-use, like Stadium looks to be.
But before any doubts arise, we have to wait until it is there and we know all the changes.
With the possibility to chose between titles, no one is anymore forced to by titles he doesn't like.
This is the fruit of the many complains about coast handling, although I personally love this environment :oops:

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 19 Jan 2013, 19:22
by zarexz
TMarc wrote:With the possibility to chose between titles, no one is anymore forced to by titles he doesn't like.
This is the fruit of the many complains about coast handling, although I personally love this environment :oops:
Sadly to my opinnion, the fruit of that situation is that we can't have multi environment servers anymore. Which probably leeds to, especialy if f2p, crowded stadium servers "because everybody is always there" and a totaly dead canyon and valley.

I'm really no fan of the comming situation.

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 20 Jan 2013, 00:34
by Smigles
The problem is not the price.

The problem is that this game is STILL in beta and they are expecting people to pay for it. We just dont get enugh for our money.
zarexz wrote:Sadly to my opinnion, the fruit of that situation is that we can't have multi environment servers anymore. Which probably leeds to, especialy if f2p, crowded stadium servers "because everybody is always there" and a totaly dead canyon and valley.
It's allready the case in canyon. Only very few servers get players, and they are all either FS or LOL servers. Try finding a server with techy maps 45sec+. good luck.

Oh and the idea that we dont want multiple envi servers must come from the devil himself. I still wonder who was so stupid to come up with this idea. The sheer amount of stupidity boggles my mind.

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 20 Jan 2013, 13:21
by crado
J'ai vraiment pas d'accord sur F2P!

Obtenir de l'argent pour NADEO pour leur excellent travail!

Re: Free2Play

Posted: 20 Jan 2013, 13:55
by zarexz
Yep, only the french and the german think the whole world speaks their language. English please?