Maniaplanet Forum

There's a game out, I think you can find it for like 5 bucks at your local bargin-bin videogame store...it's called Treadmarks. Ridiculously arcade-like, but insanely fun. Tanks. Everywhere. You can set anything from 2 tanks up to 500, but be prepped for a HUGE PC hit if you do that. But everything in the environment can be changed...mountains can be leveled, and new mountains can be made with a unique terraforming weapon. Look it up, Nadeo, if you want any tips on how to make insanity fun.

*build map*
"meh, don't like it"
*bomb*
*build map on top of rubble*
"don't like either*
*etc...*
Congratulations; you now have a tower of rubble to play on.

I think it is fun to blow up buildings at one side, but at the other hand, it would also be nice to hide in buildings that can't be destroyed.

So maybe an option to allow buildings to be destroyed ingame?

(or maybe as a game mode: "Destroy the Buildings in a specified time!")

I hate this idea really just stupid....
this would be like OMG CAMPER NOOB wait i got my rpg hehe boom building down worst idea (btw im not a camper but im a rusher xD) and wat if u shoot the wall and it goes backwards so i disagree...

@Sizeftw: Have you ever played Battlefield: Bad company 2? Because this has a destroy system and it is very well done. And it was very cool. And I think it's good that you can't destroy the campers spot because it is very annoying when there is a freakin good camper. I better like very good snipers that will move.

AngelFred wrote:@Sizeftw: Have you ever played Battlefield: Bad company 2? Because this has a destroy system and it is very well done. And it was very cool. And I think it's good that you can't destroy the campers spot because it is very annoying when there is a freakin good camper. I better like very good snipers that will move.

still fail and plus i don't think u can't destroy buildings in multiplayer lmfao srlsy

Sizeftw wrote:

AngelFred wrote:@Sizeftw: Have you ever played Battlefield: Bad company 2? Because this has a destroy system and it is very well done. And it was very cool. And I think it's good that you can't destroy the campers spot because it is very annoying when there is a freakin good camper. I better like very good snipers that will move.

still fail and plus i don't think u can't destroy buildings in multiplayer lmfao srlsy

Never underestimate Nadeo.

Sizeftw wrote:

AngelFred wrote:@Sizeftw: Have you ever played Battlefield: Bad company 2? Because this has a destroy system and it is very well done. And it was very cool. And I think it's good that you can't destroy the campers spot because it is very annoying when there is a freakin good camper. I better like very good snipers that will move.

still fail and plus i don't think u can't destroy buildings in multiplayer lmfao srlsy

I think you wanted to say «I don't think you CAN destroy buildings in multiplayer» and the answer is: yes, you can. And this is awesome but I don't want to start a debate on this so let's stop here .

AngelFred wrote:

Sizeftw wrote:

AngelFred wrote:@Sizeftw: Have you ever played Battlefield: Bad company 2? Because this has a destroy system and it is very well done. And it was very cool. And I think it's good that you can't destroy the campers spot because it is very annoying when there is a freakin good camper. I better like very good snipers that will move.

still fail and plus i don't think u can't destroy buildings in multiplayer lmfao srlsy

I think you wanted to say «I don't think you CAN destroy buildings in multiplayer» and the answer is: yes, you can. And this is awesome but I don't want to start a debate on this so let's stop here .

thanks for correcting me lol but im pretty sure they won't because otherwise it would be alot of work it would take ages

Sizeftw, how many games don't have destructible environments anymore? Few, if any. And treadmarks (see above) isn't just a singleplayer game, it's the Trackmania of tank combat. Like I said, anywhere from 2 tanks to 500, and in MP, it's the same story. Google it (Treadmarks PC).