Hylis wrote:I don't think any environment ever had so many players than Canyon, except Stadium of course.
I think the same. As a single environment, Canyon does pretty well.
But on the other hand, the 6 environments of TMU (and even Stadium is sort of way) were much more linked than the environments of now. Once you had one installed, you had all the others. Which implied, there was a single community for the whole TMU and in my opinion Canyon shouldn't be compared with any specific environment of TMU. It will be way harder to unite the whole TM2 community because lots of players will not have all the environments. Last but not least, i have the feeling the Canyon community is less active than the old TMU one in terms of initiatives: they involve less in new projects and they wait more from Nadeo or older players to lead the changes. Of course it's an observation of the average community, those who take initiatives shouldn't feel attacked. And even the others, i can pretty well understand that lots of players don't haven enough time for instance... But the average observation show trends, and the trend of nowadays is to more passiveness, i'm affraid. If someone has ideas about how to change this, it could be a good idea of debate i think.
Hylis wrote:With more people and less divisions, there will be less complain.
As said above, i don't really agree about "less divisions". I hope to be wrong, though.
Hylis wrote:And I agree that people complain because they expect things to be perfect while we just do our best. But, then, I think they are going to complain for a lot of things against a lot of people

In the whole life, people complain about lots of things because they complain about anything that isn't perfect. On the other hand, if you asked people to give a mark to Maniaplanet, lots of "complainers" might give 7, 8 or even 9/10. Surely, the feedback you get is more negative than the truth, because we don't bring an overall opinion of the game with each thing we criticize. Neverhteless, as said eyebo, the simple fact players come here and write messages (sometimes long) show they care about TM and they love it. The players you really disappoint don't come here to complain, they just leave and shut-up, while playing another game. Of course, it can get on your nerves when you have to deal with such a phenomena. After all, everybody is a human an nobody likes to be flamed.
TMarc wrote:A new stuff is only good, when the older stuff does not exist anymore
I guess your point is ironical... But anyway a new thing should be considered as good when it surpasses the older one (and only then).
TMarc wrote:And look at the complaints of TMN players, whatever Nadeo is doing with TrackMania²Stadium, it is not good enough.
It's quite hard to have an holistic view of the stadium community regarding this issue. Each player has one's own expectations about the evolution of the game and the expectations of A aren't those of B. Thus whatever Nadeo does, either A or B will complain. But it gives the impression that the whole community wants both everything and nothing. I makes me wonder about the Hydra of the greek mythology: with so much heads (thus brains?) how could it have a consistant wisedom?
TMarc wrote:Let's see in 10 years, what people then think about TM² and TM

We should hope TM² surpasses TM until then, otherwise it would be a huge failure...
eyebo wrote:I actually think most of the "complaining" about TM2C is over. People either like it or they don't. As Hylis has said, it's a very polarizing environment. I think that's fine. And I don't really see a lot of forum posts trying to nag about it anymore.
Strangely, i had the opposite thought about Canyon. For me, this environment was intended to please everybody (at least moderately). When Hylis presented it, he said they input things from all the environment and at the moment i really had the impression they tried to make something rather "classic", that would be able to gather a large variety of players. And today the Canyon community contains former United players, former TMN ones and newcomers so it has been archieved in a certain way. I thought they tried to avoid to make a sequel of TMN, or a sequel of TMU, to stay from scratch the new TM was for everybody. And now we have the sequels of both (Stadium 2 and Valley) that are coming. [EDIT: well, it seems the contrary of what Hylis said in this topic...Maybe i misunderstood at the moment]
It's normal that people stop complaining about the physics/gameplay of Canyon, because after a period you know the environment will not be changed and complaining is useless. You like it or not, but it will stay as it is.
eyebo wrote:--- Price ---
I think it is not the best option to make Stadium (partly) free while other environments are not. Because it will maintain a huge business difference between the environments and over the long run it risks to prevent Stadium to fit in the whole Trackmania.
If a single environment should be free, i think it should be the last version. For instance, make Valley partly free when it cames out, while Stadiums become totally charged (and 20 euros like others). And when the 4th TM2 environment cames out, make it free while Valley becomes 20 euros charged. The free version would then be used to boost the start of a new game instead of giving a permanent gift to a part of the community, but a part only. And after having played 6 months we can expect players to take part to the development cost if they really like the game. Else... Let they go away.
Zooz wrote:Also, misinformation is something that is not necessarily the community's fault, if the information we get is unclear, then it is difficult to be well informed. In the TM community I notice way too often that important information is only available in some forum post somewhere, and you are still expected to know about it when you post on the forum (i.e. people will be like "come on why do you ask, everyone knows that, see this post by Hylis in some offtopic thread from 2009")
And the game interface isn't very informative either, finding out how the ladder system works also involves a lot of forum searching

I agree, although it's not that simple to make a lot of information available through a simple clic. We could imagine a specific part in the forums, where only Nadeo members can post and that gathers all official information. You could access those threads from the forum index or from some ingame links, clicking on "learn more" icons for instance. It's an idea, maybe someone can suggest better. (And it already exists at some point with the competitions feature being linked with some info on the player page).
And regarding how many posts from Nadeo guys we have here, i think they are making efforts to inform us, maybe it just needs to be tidy.