plopp wrote:Ofc it's not supposed to be like this. However, people see other people using this method.
When Nadeo then responds to this method other these people will see that it works and they'll start using it.
And that's why we all (including Nadeo!) have to withstand and repulse those bad examples.
Sometimes responses to aggressive (let's take it more neutral: questioning) posts sounds jokingly or offended, as if the honor of the developpers was hurt.
They do their work with dedication and passion, some of them I see active even on the weekends,
so it's understandable that they feel misunderstood and offended if they get only negative criticism.
On the other side, the users have so many ideas and wishes, only some get implemented, and many others rejected.
The good balance between bad answers, good answers and no answer is difficult to find, and after so long time of presence it isn't still ideal.
The need to discuss this proceeeding and this "discussion culture" is still necessary.
plopp wrote:I see lot of topics that are calm and collected, lots of valid points and no response from Nadeo. This makes the creator of said topic feel ignored.
that's true. Although they sometimes write that they read "everything".
I remember of some tries to get Nadeo to communicate more. These weeks after the update and long beta test and again an update it is again very quiet. To quiet from Nadeo side
plopp wrote:You're right, Nadeo has no obligation to answer any questions, but when they chose to answer topics like "b3 sucks" or "The new walljumps are shit" it sends a message to the rest of the community.
As said above, it certainly depends on the answer, if it gives a good or a bad impression.
It would be sad if they don't care too much on short term (because of the "long term strategy").
plopp wrote:Since this is really off-topic I expect to get banned

to which place?
I mean, we can split this topic, but I don't know at which post to start here...