Maniaplanet Forum

Would love to see a rule for the points distribution on RoC servers. Because i don't like the 31 points till round end and the winner gets 10, and the round is without WU. Couldn't there be a standardised rule for the points distribution which is more fair?

tcq wrote:Would love to see a rule for the points distribution on RoC servers. Because i don't like the 31 points till round end and the winner gets 10, and the round is without WU. Couldn't there be a standardised rule for the points distribution which is more fair?

I aggree of making limitations for that, but with limitations I mean keeping a range of modifications for the roc owners at all. Keep in mind, that even rocs are likly more "official" than all the other ladder server types, they need to be defined strict cause of their low avaibility, BUT also keep in mind, that trackmania is a game about creativity and we shouldn't kill this point of the game for roc servers

So, basically I aggree, there is a need of kind of limitations for the roundpoints system on rocs, but don't revoke too much possibilities to create the game from the roc owner.

Cheers,
Bueddl

Bueddl wrote:

tcq wrote:Would love to see a rule for the points distribution on RoC servers. Because i don't like the 31 points till round end and the winner gets 10, and the round is without WU. Couldn't there be a standardised rule for the points distribution which is more fair?

I aggree of making limitations for that, but with limitations I mean keeping a range of modifications for the roc owners at all. Keep in mind, that even rocs are likly more "official" than all the other ladder server types, they need to be defined strict cause of their low avaibility, BUT also keep in mind, that trackmania is a game about creativity and we shouldn't kill this point of the game for roc servers

So, basically I aggree, there is a need of kind of limitations for the roundpoints system on rocs, but don't revoke too much possibilities to create the game from the roc owner.

Cheers,
Bueddl

I agree with that, to many limitations wouldn't be very cool for us.

In other words, to add more rules for RoC => the hoster has no more freedoms of his settings as starting his own serverlogin and password?^^

The most RoC servers in TM1 have the "GPmode" Pointsystem or 31,27,25,... I know only one server with the standard settings with the pointsystem of 10,6,4,... points. If you want add this as standard rule for RoC, the hoster need only to start his server with his mappack and (...) ^^

No, but i would still insist to make at least a WU run mandatory. Because if you have a slower internet connection you might be start seconds late and there goes your chance. And it would be more friendly for people which don't know the map or need a little refreshment of the way.

kripkee wrote:In other words, to add more rules for RoC => the hoster has no more freedoms of his settings as starting his own serverlogin and password?^^

You can still have other maps on the server .. This would be my second point, while not make all RoCs use the same maps? ... Just kidding ;D

tcq wrote:No, but i would still insist to make at least a WU run mandatory. Because if you have a slower internet connection you might be start seconds late and there goes your chance. And it would be more friendly for people which don't know the map or need a little refreshment of the way.

Absolutly aggree with that!
@Cerovan: can we have a statement to this from you?

tcq wrote:No, but i would still insist to make at least a WU run mandatory. Because if you have a slower internet connection you might be start seconds late and there goes your chance. And it would be more friendly for people which don't know the map or need a little refreshment of the way.

Maybe, but on the other side, you can train this maps bofore and after RoC. I know that some servers have 14+ maps of the rest time, in my opinion these server should release a mappack^^

tcq wrote:

kripkee wrote:In other words, to add more rules for RoC => the hoster has no more freedoms of his settings as starting his own serverlogin and password?^^

You can still have other maps on the server .. This would be my second point, while not make all RoCs use the same maps? ... Just kidding ;D

Same maps would be funny, but useless i think. Of course everybody have the same chance and so on.. but I don't know.. it can be boring if you have 20 RoC servers with only other names and same maps/settings.. (if this was a joke, pls ignore this^^)

Hello, Comunity,

What must I make to receive a ROC?

Have several servers hostet and in run, and now is asked constantly why we still have no ROC.

MasteradminLRT: login huibuibuh2

my Server:
LRT FunSpeed AREA[manialink=]maniaplanet://#join=lrtadrenaline[/manialink]


Hostet ManiaCs-Server

Masteradmin ManiaCs: login maniaccyber

ManiaCs on Canyon One[manialink=]maniaplanet://#join=maniaclinden[/manialink]
ManiaCs on Canyon Two[manialink=]maniaplanet://#join=maniaclinden3[/manialink]
ManiaCs on Canyon Three[manialink=]maniaplanet://#join=maniaclinden4[/manialink]

ROC should become lrtadrenaline, maniaclindenroc. last momently not in use.

all Server in Round-Mode have a AutoQueue (in otherweis, SpecJam Bug free)

Email to leader@lrt-clan.de

The whole ManiaC server run through me (to the info)
I hoste still other servers in TM1
we have more than 12000 Logins (Player at the Month) Datavolume is more then 483778.98 MB..

Cerovan can you me add to the ROC server waitinglist for 2 ACC's ?

Thanks for Regards.. Mossi

Mossi wrote:Hello, Comunity,

What must I make to receive a ROC?

Have several servers in run, and now is asked constantly why we still have no ROC.

I added you on the waiting list

About the WU run mandatory, there is no need for the moment but if i feel need later, i'll think about it

Thanks for this take up in the waiting list.

many greets, Mossi, Cyber...