Ladder on 100K

[Cerovan]

Hello,

I announce a small change about the inscription for a RoC Server for current owners (and the next ones, etc), you have to wait the end of your rotation (each time) before asking to be put on the waiting list

Thanks!

[killer606]

Hello,

I announce a small change about the inscription for a RoC Server for current owners (and the next ones, etc), you have to wait the end of your rotation (each time) before asking to be put on the waiting list

Thanks!

For the RoC owners now too? (Laurens, CN and me?) Because I think that we are already on the list.

Regards,
Mark

[Cerovan]

That's for you too

[killer606]

Ok. Shoot.

[Bueddl]

Hello, Comunity,

What must I make to receive a ROC?

Have several servers in run, and now is asked constantly why we still have no ROC.

I added you on the waiting list

About the WU run mandatory, there is no need for the moment but if i feel need later, i'll think about it

I also requested a roc in this topic, did you add me , too? I didn't receive such a notification....

Cheers,
Bueddl

[Cerovan]

Yes you're in the waiting list too

[Bueddl]

Yes you're in the waiting list too

Many thanks

[alexudallaTM2]

Hey Cerovan,

could you please add me to the waiting list for roc server?

email: alexudalla@hotmail.es
login: alexudalla
serverlogin: coler7tm2

Thanks and cheers,
Alexudalla

[laurens92]

Well, this is a bad change, Because the many requests, there will be waiting lists for years.
Imo, the rules hadn't to be changed, a RoC forever was much nicer, The players know where to play etc..
When the server gets inactive while RoC, you can change it to someone else, but why now?

I'll lose the motivation for sure after my RoC is closed,
EXCEPT if there should come a rule that a server has to choose from a tracklist.
For exemple a tracklist with 20 tracks where the server owner can choose some tracks.
But this is just bad, the new RoC servers will use totaly diffirent maps & well, i've better things to do on TM
Then testing some new RoC maps, if there comes a friendly server with the same maps then the current servers.
Well, then you'll see me maybe, but otherwise.. To the point now: go back to the TMUF system or RoC will be again for noobs, I don't mean this bad, but lol, look the top 10..

Regards Laurens.

[killer606]

Well, this is a bad change, Because the many requests, there will be waiting lists for years.
Imo, the rules hadn't to be changed, a RoC forever was much nicer, The players know where to play etc..
When the server gets inactive while RoC, you can change it to someone else, but why now?

I'll lose the motivation for sure after my RoC is closed,
EXCEPT if there should come a rule that a server has to choose from a tracklist.
For exemple a tracklist with 20 tracks where the server owner can choose some tracks.
But this is just bad, the new RoC servers will use totaly diffirent maps & well, i've better things to do on TM
Then testing some new RoC maps, if there comes a friendly server with the same maps then the current servers.
Well, then you'll see me maybe, but otherwise.. To the point now: go back to the TMUF system or RoC will be again for noobs, I don't mean this bad, but lol, look the top 10..

Regards Laurens.

I completely agree with Lau. Many players like our 3 Mappacks, because every mappack is different. If someone dont like the Tracks on Killer RoC he can go to Revival, if the maps are there bad for him he can go to atp 100k. I cant see a need of rotation, because if theres the new server, and new maps,... many players wont play roc anymore because it needs many time to train all the maps to be able to kill all other players on the server.
In my opinion this is a bad system and Nadeo should move back to the old TMUF system...

Regards,
Mark