Rules for RoC servers and explanations for ladder servers

[JAJA]

avec tout le respect que je peux avoir envers NADEO et tous les super-admins de Canyon , je voudrais savoir quelle importance il y aurait d'avoir une dizaine de serveur ROC ( même à moitié vide le dimanche ) , mais qui au contraire satisferait aussi bien les joueurs que les admins ROC ??? les règles ne seraient pas bafouées , et tout le monde aurait sa chance , du petit joueur (comme moi ) au pro des ROCs qui pourraient jouer ensemble sans qu'on les embête ...
merci de m'avoir lu.....

Edit by Mod:
Can't be so hard to use google translate, right? This is the English section,
http://translate.google.com/

with all due respect I may have to NADEO and all super-admins Canyon, I would like to know how important it would have a dozen server ROC (even half empty on Sundays), but instead would also meet many players as admins ROC?? rules are not violated, and everyone would have his chance, the small player (like me;)) of pro ROCs that could play together without being annoying ...
thank you for reading .....

ok sorry and thank you...

[maniaccyber]

Hi,

thanks Cerovan for previous answer, we'll be there this Sunday

5 RoC servers will be nice.
Of course Smurf and Maniac ones should be RoC again !
Until no serious servers UP.
Cause they have no bug, serious and always present admins, and good feedback.

Hf.

Thanks sbone for your support. I agree to you.
ManiaCs and Smurfs did a very good work the last month.
Both clans are present with full engagement.
rgds
Cyber

[laurens92]

The RoC servers at the first rotation did also very good jobs.. It's a bit bullshit to go "begging"..
Every server should be rotated within this or next week, definetely.

Also (I think atm 4) RoC server are MORE MORE MORE then enough!
How more RoC server there comes, how lower the skill level.. & it's already very low..
(Example: Dawid & Ersykzer powns, I didn't drive RoC Since the first week of March & I'm still in the top 100).

Regards,
Laurens.

[Cerovan]

All the servers will be rotated and i planned to set up 5 servers for this rotation

[TheM]

The RoC servers at the first rotation did also very good jobs.. It's a bit bullshit to go "begging"..

Which is something you haven't done yet in this topic, right?... you don't have any right saying that.

yeah, keep Smurfs server and rotate the others

I'd be fine with that...

And i wouldn't
If you want to rotate, rotate all of the servers

I was joking, by the way...

All the servers will be rotated and i planned to set up 5 servers for this rotation

Okay then!

[serujio]

Also (I think atm 4) RoC server are MORE MORE MORE then enough!
How more RoC server there comes, how lower the skill level.. & it's already very low..
(Example: Dawid & Ersykzer powns, I didn't drive RoC Since the first week of March & I'm still in the top 100).

It seems it is more important to have more servers, for players that have less skill not having to wait 6 rounds to play again after losing, like happened on the last sunday sometimes. Since ROC is 80k-100k, lots of less skill players will like not having to wait for so long, and it will help making them want to come back on the next week.

And Canyon have some high level players like you, but most of them seems not to care about the ladder.

[tcq]

It seems it is more important to have more servers, for players that have less skill not having to wait 6 rounds to play again after losing, like happened on the last sunday sometimes. Since ROC is 80k-100k, lots of less skill players will like not having to wait for so long, and it will help making them want to come back on the next week.

That is exactly the sense of a ladder server. To distinguish between strong and week players. If a player is not able to play because he gets kicked out then he has either not trained the map enough or he is simply to bad. Better have less servers full of players instead of having many servers with less players. At least this is how I fell about RoCs. For example it was simply awesome to fight with zooz, kaboom and phenomega on the first TMU RoCs. But later you hade so many players distributed over many different servers because as soon as two or more of the top players joined all players left for weaker servers. If you reduce the amount of servers this will not happen and therefore the ladder has at least a little bit sense (not that it has sense at all because of the awarding of the player that has the most time on a Sunday afternoon).

[JAJA]

personnellement , si j'achète un jeu c'est pour y joué ,pas pour regarder les autres le dimanche a.m

Personally, if I buy a game that is played there, not to watch the other Sunday afternoon

[serujio]

not that it has sense at all because of the awarding of the player that has the most time on a Sunday afternoon

yeah, I always thought it was bad that very top players don´t care about playing the ladder. It seems that this format is not the best to define the best of the world.

in the way it is done, I still think it´s good to have more servers, since ROCs are made for 80k-100k, and not for 95k-100k.

But it seems that a cup format like e-sport tournaments do, could atract more of the very best players.

[laurens92]

I agree with tcq.. It's just stupid players want more servers..
They are just too bad to rank up on the ladder, accept it, play for fun or don't play it!
5 servers are way way way too much.. 3 was awesome! If you go higher then 5 in the future, it's just a disaster..

Also, sunday afternoon 3 hours driving, I don't have time anymore for that & the most pro players don't have + like said before they don't care about ladder. I would love it, if the pro players would all play to get rid of non-capable-roc-players.