MAPS FOR ESWC

Talk about the online play and eSport / team

Moderator: English Moderator

User avatar
dreammyw0w
Posts: 690
Joined: 04 Jan 2013, 17:34
Location: Antwerp

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by dreammyw0w »

Cuba.CZ wrote:
Keremz wrote:you did maps that did not even fulfill what nadeo admins said they wanted such as rooftops for spectators matters. This fact only shows how much some guys in charge of this supervised it properly.
Should remind here that organizing (picking maps etc) the ESWC is NOT Nadeo's job.
Anyway what I think would be the most viable solution to make everyone happy is contact the eswc staff so that they start a poll with the maps from the most recent mappack & classic maps like collided, the castle & some of the new maps and let the community vote.

But complaining to Nadeo about it is not gonna do a thing. Because they don't have anything to do with it.
Well , clearly a ordinary everyday player isnt contacting admins of one of the biggest lans on the planet to ask for maps?
Its not our job, duh!
+ As you can notice if you read posts carefully, NADEO had contact with the admins. How else would they know the criteria? + papy ( is from nadeo ) and he made maps so...

Why cant he (NADEO )contact them for us?

PS : Sorry PAPPY if you feel super offended in this thread. Its not ur fault bro :) Most of the critics is towards NADEO :)
Sephis
Posts: 96
Joined: 31 May 2012, 21:25

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by Sephis »

PapyChampy wrote:Malevolence and Golden Rush (especially Malevolence) are full of grills => Not suitable considering the restrictions.

And, for the last time : Don't get mad at me while I'm taking time on my vacations to explain things to you, as I'm only following what ESWC officials wanted.

Then make a list of the maps that are suitable for ESWC and ask everyone to vote. How hard is that ? Why imposing 3 new maps to us, which obviously NOONE except the map makers themselves like ?
The_Big_Boo
Posts: 1026
Joined: 15 Jun 2010, 15:46

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by The_Big_Boo »

evlish wrote:Who gives a darn about the appearance, quake/UT were ugly as shit and still it was enjoyable to watch.
No, they were not. It was enjoyable to watch for a few which were aware enough about the game but others were mostly not attracted because it was just boring not knowing what's happening. It seems you're not caring at all about having a wide the audience. But without audience, you won't have big events forever.
OS: Win 7 Pro x64
RAM: 2x4GB Corsair @ 1600MHz
CPU: Intel i5 760 @ 3.6GHz
Mobo: Asus P7P55D-E
GPU: NVidia GTX 760 2GB
HDD: WD Black 1TB
Sound: VIA VT1828S (onboard)
Peripherals: Razer DeathAdder - Razer DeathStalker - Logitech F310
User avatar
dreammyw0w
Posts: 690
Joined: 04 Jan 2013, 17:34
Location: Antwerp

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by dreammyw0w »

The_Big_Boo wrote:
evlish wrote:Who gives a darn about the appearance, quake/UT were ugly as shit and still it was enjoyable to watch.
No, they were not. It was enjoyable to watch for a few which were aware enough about the game but others were mostly not attracted because it was just boring not knowing what's happening. It seems you're not caring at all about having a wide the audience. But without audience, you won't have big events forever.

maybe 'good adversting' works.

People watch games cuz its fun , fast & enjoyable. Not because of the grapics at all.
Btw streaming quality is usualy shit. A lot of players watch 480p so its always Squaremania.

I will proof it to you : CS1.6 ( shittttttt graphics compared to SM ) has 50k viewers on streams easily :)
Because , newsflash , people dont watch streams for the graphics.

With these maps & settings, players will leave and we dont need big events anymore :)
User avatar
PapyChampy
Posts: 817
Joined: 15 Jun 2010, 15:02
Location: Paris

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by PapyChampy »

I'll be very clear, Tazzmajazz asked me to do this selection. Contact him if necessary.

Remember : Maps need to be :

- Good looking /realistic scenery/ No random blocks

- Very little / no camping behaviour

Good luck meeting those criterias.

I've taken enough blame for things i'm not responsible for. I'm done here.
Image
Sephis
Posts: 96
Joined: 31 May 2012, 21:25

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by Sephis »

PapyChampy wrote: Remember : Maps need to be :

- No random blocks

- Very little

Good luck meeting those criterias.

Oh, okay. That's good to know. Bas, this time try to make maps that are suitable please.
User avatar
Ozon
Posts: 956
Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 13:12
Contact:

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by Ozon »

Maniaplanet used to be a community with love.. just what Trackmania has been the last 10 years. This thread is a huge slap in the face for me and I guess for many of us.

:0010 for the behavior.
Image
ManiaExchange Lead Developer, video person and experienced project organizer.
Discord: Ozon#0359 · MX · Adventcalendar resources · TM-Tube is back
LemondogsDALADAVVE
Posts: 1
Joined: 06 Aug 2013, 22:51

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by LemondogsDALADAVVE »

[EDITED : Don't use the F word, noob.]

GAB
The_Big_Boo
Posts: 1026
Joined: 15 Jun 2010, 15:46

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by The_Big_Boo »

@dreammy: So you're saying someone who has never played Quake could enjoy watching a Quake match just thanks to advertising? The appearance isn't really about good graphics. You need the action to be easily understandable and coherent maps (which excludes maps with grids and walls placed everywhere in very ugly ways like it is in some of them).
OS: Win 7 Pro x64
RAM: 2x4GB Corsair @ 1600MHz
CPU: Intel i5 760 @ 3.6GHz
Mobo: Asus P7P55D-E
GPU: NVidia GTX 760 2GB
HDD: WD Black 1TB
Sound: VIA VT1828S (onboard)
Peripherals: Razer DeathAdder - Razer DeathStalker - Logitech F310
User avatar
PapyChampy
Posts: 817
Joined: 15 Jun 2010, 15:02
Location: Paris

Re: MAPS FOR ESWC

Post by PapyChampy »

LemondogsDALADAVVE wrote:THIS IS FUCKING DISQUSTING REALLY? i waited so long for ESWC and then i seee the map pool and B3 FUCKING CHANGE THIS THING, WONDER WHY PPL QUIT THIS GAME WHEN U DO THINGS LIKE THIS , SPECIALLY FOR BIG EVENTS !

YOLO
Sure, caps lock will help.

@ Sephis : clever edit, but don't transform the meaning of my post. Thanks.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Multiplayer”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest